Even if the typical

Even if the typical web surfer does not stop to think about it, web designers already familiar with usability testing. Uses a label used to what most people consider to be user friendly. Although many of us have our own ideas about what we believe a user friendly, the truth is that we can not determine with ease. Like art, you only identify when you see it. Different from the art, the website should be simple to use as possible as readers of the website as much as possible. Being easy to use is an important element for an internet site that has a large community of web readers who come to the site every month.



In fact, the site traffic today highest general usability testing, and make minor repairs to the web page from time to time. When we conduct usability testing, we find some things that detailed. Web designers use a combination of web-based testing and laboratory-based testing to solve problems that require the majority of repairs.



Especially, we need to know if the reader was able to complete key work on the site, if we find any problems, and how easy it is for the reader experienced sites to learn about the site. These ideas are fundamental and usability testing what is most easy to find. But an additional element to the web site must be studied if we are to achieve the level of probable usefulness.



Does the website permit the reader to manage what we are doing at any given moment? Are the contents of the site offers what the user is looking for when we try to achieve our goals? Does the website look clean and attractive to the eye? At every point in the process of completing the task, is to tell the user all the data he needs? Does the site have the same settings on every page or whether it causes uncertainty? readers will be more likely to return to the site if the web designers are able to answer their ideas and improve the web site accordingly.



There are two main strategies to answer this question. One involves the direct assessment of the site to collect data when a user visits. Inviting users to the original lab and we pose these questions because we operate a website is the second method.



Because the user at home for testing web-based, information is collected more often than not is more natural. Because the collection of information automatically, it's easy to find things in the process where people ran into the error or failure. However, it can be tricky to understand the emotions behind the urge users because the information does not capture this feature.



By asking users to open, a web designer can explain this deficiency. A mediator can tidy ask people what we think or feel when we try something. But because it takes time to ask users directly, a large number of individuals who are relatively smaller. Test bias is also possible that the technique interview the interviewer can bias the user to a different answer.



Both techniques have their pros and cons, and it is important to do both for total image quality of the current website usability. By studying the minds and actions of users, web designers can use this information to improve a website, making it easy to operate and learn for everyone.